pull down to refresh
On top of that the nations that seem to care most about it are the most wealthy ones. Not the poorest. The poorest have much more pressing and solvable problems like diseases that can be healed, hunger, and general societal development.
The reality is that even if the whole world followed the guidance of the UN's study on climate change it would not be enough. These are their own estimations. They also estimate it will depress the development of these poor nations.
I'm sure there are many sincere people concerned about climate change but they sure don't seem to be in positions of power. It seems those people are more concerned with power.
I don't think most people get how much smoke and mirrors are in tech. They used to call it vaporware
I wondered about that. There's a hype machine to sell AI and a reflective reactionary anti-AI hype machine. It's so obvious when you don't buy into either.
Its a pattern we see play out in politics too. It just works to get attention but IMO it's a trap that makes us dumber.
Do they not do test pilot program? Honestly, AI is exposing how lazy many companies are and how trusting they are of technology. I use AI everyday but I don't really trust it. What I have seen over and over again are skill issues and incompetence by implementation. The AI charlatans have convinced the weak minded its magic. It's not. Managers are being exposed as well as devs that are lazy.
AI is just software. It's new, poorly understood, and buggy. Grab the popcorn
Indeed. Every speech from political figures are full of nonsense. The stupidity of it all is when people only see it on one side.
Looking forward to watching this. It's a topic of interest to me. Housing is a frustrating topic. The issues can be very localized but the patterns aren't complex.
From what I have read, seen, and heard from people in the real estate market there is a massive housing supply shortage which is worse in California which never has really recovered from 2008 crash.
Zoning in many areas make the issues worse. Local rules I fluenced by the World Economic Forum has played a part. Some of the rules might have come from a good place but the impact is driving prices up. Of course there are plenty of people that wanna see this. And it's not just BlackRock. It's home owners that use their house as a savings account.
Yeah, Fiat is probably the biggest issue. It drives people into stocks and real estate as well as the BlackRocks. Removing or at least reforming housing regulations could massively help but sound money (bitcoin) is the real solution. Your home should not be your savings account.
Yeah, I dig it. The truth is, as Thomas Sowell says, there are no solutions, only tradeoffs. But tradeoffs are rarely considered let alone discussed.
I'm a broken record on this on every team I have worked with. I'm always the guy talking about the tradeoffs of different directions/decisions. Especially when I really want to do one of them more than the other. It's easy to get in a rut and get tunnel vision. But trailblazing is often far more risky.
Would love a review
He probably writes this but they can also happen organically. Just as in nature there are times of upheaval.
It is helpful for me to think of the state as an external force that manipulates a system that is self regulating. By that I mean that businesses that fail to meet or satisfy demand fail. Those that abuse their power over a market sector invite new entrants into their sector. When you actually think about the way free markets work it's beautiful.
The ugly thing is when an external force uses monopoly power to manipulate things to favor those that have bribed the unproductive class(politicians and "civil servants").
"For Christmas I'm gonna mammogram the kids sweatshirts"
Thing I heard while shopping today.