pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @keele 25 Oct \ parent \ on: The socialist housing plan for New York City econ
StackerNews is for high quality conversation, not whatever low effort you're engaging in. I asked you if you've read Hayek and you ignored the question. I also raised the most central issue I see with ignoring the warnings from Hayek and you ignored that as well. I can't be bothered continuing this low effort conversation as it's not giving me or anyone else anything of value.
Have you read The Road To Serfdom by Hayek? Anyone trying to convince me free markets aren't the best would have to make a compelling argument how Hayek is wrong. Because all I have ever seen is more central planning, more restrictions and more interventions and the outcome has been exactly as predicted by Hayek. Particularly hard resonates the point that people stop trying to improve their own lives by working and improving their skills and instead people become increasingly political.
I don't have any chatbot service subscription so I chose "No, I haven't tried". But nearly all of my google or duckduckgo searches now display an AI overview. It's basically always wrong.
I try to keep an open mind towards new technology, but the current AI craze I don't understand. I'm a programmer and I've been doing "AI" since the 90's. I've also used ML in things like image recognition, translation and speech synthesis.
I've read multiple books on artificial intelligence such as "Behind Deep Blue" and of course "Gödel, Escher, Bach". I think Hofstadter is spot on that the paradox of self-reference is present everywhere.
I hear a lot of people say that you need to learn how to use a chatbot. It's a skill and the answers improve as your prompts get better. Well, yeah, this is self-reference in play if I've ever seen it. My problem is that the effort spent on improving the input to the chatbot might as well be spent on proper research into the topic.
For asking simple questions where I can easily spot the wrong answer it's fine. However, when I'm doing coding, I need to understand the code and code written by an LLM can't be trusted. I've also seen some of the answers Gemini returns when I've asked some medical questions and it's horrifying to be quite honest.
I'm running a full node on a server with a 1TB hard drive just like you:
$ df -h | sed -n '1p;/\/$/p'
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/nvme0n1p2 937G 555G 334G 63% /
Bitcoin blocks use up more than 500 gigabytes:
$ du -hs .bitcoin/blocks/
516G .bitcoin/blocks/
To reduce disk usage, you can run your node in pruning mode: https://bitcoin.org/en/full-node#configuration-tuning
Pruning does not lower security, but you lose historical data. Personally, I want to run a full archival node. I plan on upgrading my node eventually as free disk space starts to run low. But there's still several years before that.
If you don't care about archiving, reconfigure your node to run in pruning mode!
GENESIS