pull down to refresh
We use SSH that verifies in the same way, PGP wouldn't have changed anything, a botched branch rule on one repo was the gap in preventing the push at all ... and vigilance mode would have flagged it more visibly
We don't distribute binaries that would need a signed hash
Not really feasible to run the full stack in a mobile app
However, a preconfigured CLINK connection to your Pub could work, that way guests get a turnkey ux
No, we've been pretty low profile, and most of the repos are private... but with the open stuff like Pub and Wallet gaining traction and handling more and more funds I need to implement vigilance signatures.
Was pretty burnt already when this happened. Been a long stretch trying to tie a bunch of big (and critical) features out the door on top of bug fighting... so taking a few days to live in the meatspace a bit and will come back at it with fresh eyes.
The github outage yesterday really sent me into a spin, for a moment thought we were under attack again. Trying to avoid the temptation to self-host git and actions runners altogether.
Eventually yes, its a lower priority part of the roadmap, pretty serious scope given the security considerations, but something I do want to do.
Since it uses Nostr, it opens a lot of doors for decentralizing LSP's... it'd be able to advertise channel lease sales, routing fees for new opens, swaps, etc. Like liquidity ads, but without the malign use of LN gossip. Could even pay yield to non-admin depositors connected via ShockWallet.
Don't have a timeline, but we could limp in a minimal LSPs compatible API for channel opens if you want to allocate and provide the service to other Pub users. Right now Pub uses Olympus and Flashsats LSPs (plan to also add megalithic to replace voltage which deprecated their service)
Technically possible, but it would have all the same problems of running LND on a mobile device... being asleep when it matters.
Darth has run it on an Android tablet in persistent mode, so it is viable on hardware like that used as a lite-server, but with a bit of advanced configuration.
Everything is harder on iOS though, would be a big lift to make it useful. Our whole thesis is that mobile nodes are a dead-end.
The newer breeze-sdk's aren't real Lightning nodes, its fake L2/cloud larp. They seem to have abandoned LND on mobile.
Follow-up: I nuked everything associated with it
As I mentioned in one of those threads I stood it up in a VM to attempt having github issues manipulated based on internal telegram conversations...
Over the weekend, I noticed something malicious on some of our github repos I didn't do, was done as me... very sneaky too, it edited a legit commit by me, only tell was the suspicious timestamp causing me to look at the diff.
Fortunately, caught it within an hour and was able to revert and nuke all tokens/roll keys, and all but one CI needed extra steps the compromised token could not do. The CI that did run was allowed by a mis-configured branch rule since fixed and could have been bad had it not been caught quickly.
I only tinkered with it for a day, never connected to moltbook or anything social, and somehow the github token got pwned.
I can only assume the whole thing or github skill is backdoored, there's no other explanation.
I found the experience rather sloptastic anyway, would have been better off just vibe-coding similar automation. The hype is totally unwarranted.
I don't think the meme applies.
Absolutely applies to the context at hand, you just did the meme...
Everything you've mentioned though has nothing to do with opening Pandora's box re: ICE etc (which is already open).
when using a third party, people have abdicated their fourth amendment protections
4th amendment is about unreasonable search and seizure, no new precedent has been set here. Taking witnesses phones at the scene of an incident is not uncommon, it's not "unreasonable" because its not arbitrary, these people were at a scene therefore probable cause, its not a dragnet.
3rd party data collection is a technology enabled loop-hole, but also not new. People volunteering data to 3rd parties without something analogous to attorney-client-privlege certainly gives the state more power, but that's not the state seizing that power.
Where are all the social-justice warriors on enacting something similar to attorney-client privilege? Nowhere, because the deep state that astroturfs them uses and has used this same data.
That's missing the forest for the trees anyway, the NSA knows whats on your phone regardless and you accepted that when you bought a closed source device. The 4th amendment simply makes it not admissible, and the government has an incentive not to divulge the full extent of its capabilities over paid agitators at a mundane hissy fit. That knowledge can however be used to point to things that are admissible.
"Show me the man and I'll show you the crime" is well-known as a communist quote, but as old as human organization in practice.
Think about TSA: normalizing the suspension of rights
If you've got something new that 10s of thousands of lawyers over decades have overlooked, let's hear it. I don't think anyone has come close to making the case that the right to free travel is abridged by denying access to government run infrastructure. Your right to walk across the country hasn't been abridged.
eg banking
You mean how the Trump organization is suing JPM and BoA and using the political de-banking to push Bitcoin?
no more filibuster
Not a constitutional issue.
Once these things are removed, they'll be used by both parties.
The case for Republicans removing the filibuster it is that Democrats already plan to do it if returned to majority and have openly stated so.
The more important context being that it would be for cleaning up the elections, as rigged elections are democrats only path to returning to majority.
Being so feckless as allowing them to return to power through rigged elections would be a Kerensky moment, the same weakness that let the Bolsheviks take over and do far worse than anything lolbertarians are queasy about.
things like a supermajority requirement on some votes can be a protection against tyranny
All for not if elections are rigged. The same super-majority requirement prevents dismantling parts of the administrative state, you can't complain the government never shrinks if you handcuff the people that would shrink it. People that would expand it don't have these qualms, so you're putting any good guys at a disadvantage which is how we got here in the first place.
some constraints on government power
Who puts the constraints on government power? who enforces that? The government. It's a circular argument. Power vacuums get filled regardless, you either wear the boot or the boot wears you.
So with all that cleared up, wtf has ICE/CBP/DHS done that pushes new boundaries? Or is this only on peoples minds because the queasy and feckless are still brainwashed enough by the MSM to virtue signal about the headlines du jour?
yawn
Subject is Bessent, try to keep up.
That said, wars cost money. Jelly your shitcoin project won't do as well "anon"?
Everything in geopolitics today goes back hundreds of years or more
I personally like the theory that any partnership with Israel is part of pulling it away from the European banks
Israel is the puppet not the master
Israel is a construct of London, it's a British colony. Look into the history of Protestant Zionists... Zionism is a tool of the globalists (old European banking money / British Imperialist) ... it has no real power of its own.
People focused on Zionism are very low IQ and either taking bait or just looking for a rationale for their TDS because they're still enured to mainstream media.
Lots of the same citadel maxi's that are for simultaneously open borders, dumbest of the dumb.
These operations are executed with military precision to the extent possible in a fog of war, and the speed being analogous to steering a cruise liner.
Best to think of it as trapping a dangerous animal, you can't just charge full Leroy Jenkins.
Cutting off funding to these networks has considerations for optics and other asymmetries like an uncontrolled collapse of the financial system itself. It's a borderline miracle that they cut 200k government jobs and implemented tariffs without creating a deflationary doom loop.
Reverting the world's apex economy from a globalist-imperial system back to the Hamiltonian American System is like moving a bridge during rush hour traffic.
Would like to see some back-testing on their announced purchase prices with the prior week price correlation. That might remove some guessing.
I always assumed purchase announcements were a week lagged, which in a down market always makes the the purchase price seem too high, but should in theory be the reverse in an up market.
I base the assumption on the logical progression of raising in week 1 via share/debt sales, buy in week 2 after settlement of that sales/filing (call that Monday), then announce week 3 after those filings (Monday). Filings and settlement probably tie their hands on execution/announcement timing.
I'm don't think shooting the shot completely on Monday-Tuesday is necessarily bad, it's still DCA over time. In an up market, if we pumped on a Weds, that's no better or worse than getting dumped on Weds in a down market.
It's also possible whoever is managing their execution is using oscillators during week 2... looking back at last week the 78k number is consistent a break of the lower RSI.
Of course, uniparty stalwarts like them stayed seated for decades not simply because voters are retarded, but because the system is rigged and the rigging is made possible through mass corruption at every level.
Cartels install or control people in government that appropriate money to NGO's, contractors, social causes etc that are front organizations.
Those fronts cycle back considerable amount of that money to keep their controlled people in government in power, PAC's, other NGO's that do astrotruf activism, industries like the media.
In effect, votes and power are bought by the incumbent with public money to perpetuate their incumbency. This is how the deep state persists to such extremes, the parasite controls the host.
This isn't new, it's as old as the country itself in various forms and one of the cases and often cited by monarchists. We're just at the end state a century and a half after the Pendleton Act made the administrative state permanant, all thats happening today is a forcing of the host to fight or die (NatSec level issue).
Patronage networks are what's already being used against Americans, this is partial remedy.
He's ending the fed by subordinating it to the treasury, and pro-Bitcoin.
Bitcoin is also a defense against these patronage networks, because the chain is transparent, unlike the opaque legacy system. By increasing surveillance on the legacy system, you push the cabal into Bitcoin that is a pillar of the re-collateralizing of the system thereby ending the fed.
Or they were moving some secretive equipment out of Ft. Bliss (1st Armored Division)