pull down to refresh
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 21h \ parent \ on: What Will Happen in 2025? oracle
Yea the an O-Plan for something like this would play out over decades, so timing of the reveal a huge variable... all we know is the clock would have started in 16 when Trump was first installed, could take another 8 years for all we know
Seems to be the direction though since then. The chaos in Canada is actually what makes me lean sooner than later, it has no leadership so that vacuum would be an opportunity to do it. The worse of a state that Canada is in the easier it'd be to get done, and it's probably the most important to the military given the arctic implications if missiles start flying.
Brexit and their collapse as a country accelerates the timeline in my view also.
tldr; the US and UK, NZ, Canada, and Australia have been effectively one apparatus since WW2
In the last few years the US also decided to sell nuclear submarines to Australia, yet we won't even sell F-22 raptors to foreign countries... nevermind nuclear tech...
Combine the militaristic stances re: eurasia/pacific, looming global financial system/debt collapse, covid/trucker psyops against their populations, and the fact it's basically already happened 80 years ago... I see it as yet another forcing function toward a US Constitutional convention
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @justin_shocknet 20 Dec \ parent \ on: Covenant support comparison by Vortex bitcoin
Cool, I'll help spread the word once it's ready
You said unilateral exit, to a real UTXO, nothing inconsistent with what I said, shared UTXO isn't real... Unilateral utxo is.
Lnhance needs millisats to deliver on what scammers like moonshitter and Rearden promised
So are you going to let them scam or support millisats?
I never said you couldn't, you're lying again
Millisats are more useful than vtxos, truly offline, unilateral exit as cheap as <1 sat, and lightning channels would be nearly free
Prove otherwise
unilaterally exit
Yea, only if you can afford a REAL utxo in the first place, because there's no such thing as shared UTXO
So millisats fork, prove it's not better
Not your UTXO not your coin, that's an immutable fact of Bitcoin... Shared UTXO aren't a thing, you don't own the coin unless you can receive a full UTXO.
Bitcoin 101 clown...
Gives me a technical proof why millisats aren't better.. literally solves poverty and onlineness requirements
Just a lil fork bro c'mon bro read it bro
Utxo sharing is a hoax though, centrally coordinated and trusted if you can't afford a real UTXO
Millisats would let you self custody a single sat trustlessly
Just a lil shitfork bro come on
You want to scale to mud farmers (cheaper)
You want solutions that work offline (base chain)
You're willing to fork to do it
So what the problem is?
Would you support a base unit increase to make self custody on-chain more accessible to mud farmers?
I've explained several ways
You don't like it because you're a disingenuous and mostly illiterate bozo that believes in mythical offline L2s... hopeless case.
Symmetry
Then shill APO instead, then at least you won't look like a scammer
Vaults
Garbage
channel factories, non-interactive channels, payment pools
Fake, centrally coordinated, trust-based cope
objectively what does LNhance do for bitcoin
Gives scammers selling fake L2s clout, and retarded vaults no one cares about.
Simple.
Proponents prove it's a scam every time they say it can do the literally impossible, scaling to mud farmers and offline L2s.