pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @javier 3 Dec \ parent \ on: If you have ever felt like a victim of @darthcoin... alter_native
Good, I will mute all of those.
I'm just going to exactly do the contrary as you do: to mute you and everybody in this thread giving you support.
He never bullied you, but you are actually bullying him. For anybody reading this, look at this thread from above and analyze what you see: people using "nice" words to passive attack a guy which has written literally thousands of guides and has massive experience of Bitcoin and governments. What are your contributions? Just speaking about being offended by somebody that actually tells the truth about you and people of your ilk.
I'm tired of people who only focus on the forms, and not the substance. We have a name for this in Spain, we call them "ofendiditos", which I guess it means the easy-ofended-fools. Those fools talk about tolerance, while they can't tolerate whoever tells the truth about them. Those fools talk about being bullied, while they bully the same or worse, and search for other fools alliances. Those fools that fall into all traps but get offended when someone points to them they have actually fallen into one.
So, thank you. I proceed to mute you fools.
Fiat money is just promises (loans) that are paid with more promises that are paid with more promises and so on. These promises never get redeemed, which means they create money every time a credit is issued, and therefore there is always inflation. They try to control this inflation by adjusting the amount of economy expansion with the interests charged on the promises, but the truth is that this has the incredible side effect to exponentially create higher and higher bubbles in cycles until the final one, which gets totally out of control, and destroys the country. It has happened all the time with smaller countries, and the only reason it is not happening so hard with bigger ones is because risk is reduced by transferring it from weaker to stronger fiat currencies. But eventually, the big wave will come to the big ones, and then there is not only those big countries which will get destroyed, but almost the whole of the global economy.
I believe this will happen between 2030 and 2045, and it will be the end of the fiat world as we know it, and of course, the emerge of Bitcoin as the global currency.
It is our task to educate people into this warning: never let them transform Bitcoin into a pseudo-fiat by allowing fractional reserve and promises over it, or Bitcoin will just end the same way fiat always ends.
Let's make an analogy:
For thousands of years, states have used gold. For thousands of years, thieves and mafia have used gold. If we consider gold to be a good thing (at least before Bitcoin), does that mean that thieves, mafia and states are good?
Obviously they aren't. This is a fallacy.
It doesn't matter if states use Bitcoin. That doesn't make them good at all.
They are just using a good thing for (very) bad purposes, as usual.
Now you substitute FreeRoss with X, or Y, or Z, and you'll see they are in everything and all operations. Since thousands of years ago.
This is the nature of politics, which is a scam profession.
Everything "public" is propaganda. Most of it is a scam, so they can acquire (rob) for free your real individual authority.
200 sats \ 0 replies \ @javier 6 Nov \ parent \ on: How to Actually Drain the Swamp Politics_And_Law
- It's impossible. Every state will grow and grow until total collapse. You just can't fire people at will, otherwise they won't vote you.
- Even if you manage to reduce them, in 4 years the next guy will increment them.
- Less people in power is more centralization of power, which leads to despotism.
Las verdaderas razones son la demolición de presas para cumplir con la agenda 2030. Por favor, mira el programa este completo porque lo explica en detalle:
I have not answered until now because I don't want to win all bounties, and give opportunities to all.
But really, these questions are pretty easy for any sovereign being. So it must be that there are no sovereign people in this forum. Which is sad.
Is there a law that force you to have a "legal name" ?
There isn't under Natural Moral Law, although it is mostly forced if you use Common Law, which is closer to Natural Law than Positive Law. The reason is because most other people will want you to have a name in order to sign a contract. But you can just sign, if the other party accepts, with a description on how to find you, for example "the blond dude living near the Colorado river".
Do you know a method to prove that you own a name or have a copyright on it ?
Under Common Law, yes, you have a method to copyright a name, or a trust, or a company, or whatever you want. This is necessary to distinguish you from other people that don't know you well, and therefore enter into contract properly with some guaranties.
But a note must be said right at this point: Common Law is not Natural Law. People decide if they want to adhere to the Common Law jurisdiction or not, but they cannot choose if they adhere to Natural Law (you are always under it). That said, Common Law is waaaay better than Postive Law (State Law).
Ok, lets do it:
When you born, you are given a name by your parents, that you use at least until you can live without their help (emancipate). Then, you can change your name or not, it's your choice.
Unfortunately, there is ANOTHER name, which is the name in which your parents registers you into the State Corporation. This name is not yours, and it is in ALL CAPS, to distinguish from the name that your parents gave to you, which is not all caps. This is merely the name of a TRUST, in which the real living man is the beneficiary, not the owner. This trust is legal (and not lawful), meaning that it is under a contract, and as such it has a series of rights and liabilities. You, as the administrator and beneficiary of such trust, are supposed to follow the rules they dictate in the contract, rules that we know as positive laws, which do change and grow over time, and made by politicians (psychopaths) to further enslave you.
The problem here is that most people are ignorant of this, and blindly follow that stupid contract, believing that they are the trust itself. This is, obviously, a scam, as Natural Moral Law demands that all parts of a contract must understand and agree to it. But you can get out just by knowing it and refusing to accept the contract they are scamming you with.
Is it clear, or do I need more clarification to win the bounty? :)
Well, it is surprising to me how ignorant people are about Natural Law in this forum, considering it is a Bitcoin forum. Is people really understanding why Bitcoin exist? It is just about regaining economic sovereignty.
It's quite simple:
- Civil rebellion: made by citizens, which means made by subjects, which are slaves of the State Corporation. Their intention is just to change "legal" law or constitution (statutes) so they can feel more comfort in their jail. It is an ignorant rebellion, as they don't know they are under contract, and by rebelling they only aspire to slightly change their way of life. But everything will continue more or less the same after the rebellion.
- Lawful rebellion: made by Sovereign Beings, not subject to any Corporation. This is a wise rebellion, as the intention is to become free from oppression of the State Corporation, or any other Corporation which is trying to scam or coerce them.
Which brings us to two different aspects of a similar term:
- Legal: under contract.
- Lawful: under Natural Moral Law.
Something lawful can also be legal, if the contract is voluntary. Something legal may not be lawful, if it is imposed without previous well informed consent.
There you have.
It's related to government. This happens mostly in countries in which the child grows and goes from parenting to gov-parenting. Govs use this to maintain happy slaves in their portfolios, and the method is as this: they use the grown ups to extract their rent and spare it over the less grown ups. In the end, maturity average is less and less, up to a point in which a big reset must happen, or otherwise mega destruction would inevitably happen.
This cycle is best understood with this meme: