I'm not sure if it would make much of a difference in these two cases; maybe it would even hurt them more because their only profits were coming from credit. Less credit, less profit! I'm not sure if that's exactly right, though.

But the main thing to highlight here is the fraud. I don't think this is what will drag the economy down, but it's possible that other companies in the sector are in similar shape.

Anyone invested in this space needs to be careful.

It's no big deal, it's 'just' a logo, and those are always down to personal opinion. Changing the name would be way, way more risky.

I don't know if my eyesight's bad, but I didn't recognize this as a bee right away, maybe because there isn't much contrast between the yellow and white. I'm not against changes, but sometimes when a logo brand is already really well-known, changing it can look strange and, in some cases, that can lead to a drop in brand recognition.

The other was better.

this option?

David's good at keeping things simple. I hadn't heard about the pixies connection, though.

Congrats! slides looked great. How did the talk go? Would you do it again, no hesitation?