pull down to refresh

  1. There's a conservative case for bitcoin book too. :)
  2. You're making a lot of assumptions - I don't believe Bitcoin is a product of the national security state.
  3. Your excellent set up was just a framing for me to chose between two ways progressives are bad. I'm not interested in that.
this territory is moderated
There's a conservative case for bitcoin
Bitcoin is just as ick to conservatives as it is to progressives, if conservatives in the modern sense were effective Bitcoin wouldn't be necessary.
You're making a lot of assumptions
I'm highlighting evidence supporting a thesis, what I want to understand is given the preponderance of that evidence how you square the circle. You don't need to agree with the conclusion.
ways progressives are bad
You were served a lay-up to explain why Bitcoin's global nature make its it anti-nationalist and or that the adoption of solutions regardless of their provenance is emblematic of progressive values.
Your negative response to that set-up projects progressive self-loathing.
reply