pull down to refresh
Cut the guy a little slack ya know... 2008 was 17 years ago.
reply
I get it, but even so, today’s language, culture, and economy aren’t really leading us toward a Type I civilization like he suggested.
reply
You sure about that? Sure the uh maga people want to delay the type-1 transition because they feel threatened by it... but the type-1 transition is definitely onging.
What do you think Bitcoin is?
reply
Bitcoin is already the best currency we have, and with mass adoption in the future, it will certainly be used by everyone in a Type 0 or Type I civilization.
What caught my attention in the text is that nothing Mr. Kaku said about us moving toward becoming a Type I civilization makes sense within the Kardashev Scale. As far as I’ve seen, the scale is based solely on energy consumption, with Type I referring to a civilization that uses a specific amount of energy—essentially all the energy the planet can generate. For me, the points he mentions, like a planetary language and economic blocs, don’t justify that classification. Language evolves, and economic blocs, as we know them, are forms of centralization and coercion.
I understand that what will drive this transition is not some beautiful unity around American culture, as he seems to suggest, but rather the competition between major nations. We’re already seeing a fierce race right now over who can stabilize nuclear fusion. China and Russia—with their own languages, cultures, and without forming a true economic bloc (BRICS is a joke)—are planning to extract Helium-3 from the moon, a key element in the fusion process.
In short, Michio Kaku gets a little too carried away when it comes to the future and sci-fi.