pull down to refresh

The follow-up from a Eurobanker just now does make a bit more sense. Still plenty of hyperbole and sarcasm in there, but there's also an observation that ought to be food for thought for those of us that are still focusing on carrier fleets:
As if to highlight Jamie’s point on the primacy of geopolitics, Ukraine managed to sneak a bunch of drones into cargo containers and then use them to take down fully one third of Russia’s long-range nuclear bombers. Some analysts are calling this a Russian Pearl Harbour (which might gloss over how the USA responded after the attack on Pearl Harbour) but the event surely highlights the changed nature of modern warfare, and the extent to which small and cheap can defeat big and expensive. We might have learned that lesson after rag-tag Houthis managed to confound the assembled forces of Western capitalism in the Red Sea, or after the war in Afghanistan took twenty years to replace Taliban with Taliban, but here it is highlighted for us once again.
I personally don't think it's a "stockpile bullets, not bitcoin" equation. But to be honest, I'm increasingly afraid for the powers on both shores of the Northern Atlantic that they're not paying enough attention to modernization, let alone invest in the development of useful defensive platforms. You don't want to be outclassed by simply because you were asleep at the wheel.
I'm spending more time each day trying to conceptualize what civilian defense against drone attacks would look like.