pull down to refresh

I'm not here to say whether Michael Saylor is good or bad for Bitcoin, but to comment on the genius in his way of communicating.
I did watch his speech at this year's Bitcoin Magazine conference, and I believe it was one of his better ones. Often, he comes off like a cult leader in his religiosity. In this speech, I didn't find that to be the case. In fact, I felt he was at his best.
The reason I am writing about Saylor here is that I believe there to be something interesting in how he conveys himself. He came off as poised, self-aware, and as ardent as ever in his evangialism. However, what I'm starting to notice, especially from this talk, is his subtle ability to speak to his audience. It was obvious that this year's conference is was distinctly more bureaucratic than it previously was, yet Saylor spoke to the everyman.
It's evident from his speech's title, 21 Ways to Wealth, that he's not talking to the political elite, asset-managers, or Wall Street (anymore) but to the commoner. You even saw it in his attire, as he didn't appear in suit and tie, but looked a little more casual than usual. There were even points in his speech where he emphasized the significance of the family unit. Unusual for him.
Is this a signal that even he acknowledges that the gig is up, and we're entering the bitcoin treasury era?
Is it an admission of the need for everyday folk to try and grasp Bitcoin's significance?
this territory is moderated
He has well-developed skills to convince others.
reply