If those people are reputable that's already better than nothing ☝🏻 Not enough to be satisfied, to trust or even to remove trust ... but better than nothing 💁🏻♀️
I think the legitimacy of Tor sites is still an unsolved problem. I'm sorry, but many people tried lot's of strategies and the truth is that none succeeded yet.
There should be a web of trust for SSL certificates integrated into browsers rather than this bizarre and complex OS/browser-distributed international list of certificate authorities. Than onion sites could have a chain of trust to the end-user without centralized trust systems.
There used to be StartSSL chain-o-trust back-in-days. Centralized, but working. Maybe one day someone creates decentralized one - and browser supporting it. Me breath is holding not :-/
Verified how? By who? Are these official links?
By the guy running the site it would seem.
If those people are reputable that's already better than nothing ☝🏻 Not enough to be satisfied, to trust or even to remove trust ... but better than nothing 💁🏻♀️
I think the legitimacy of Tor sites is still an unsolved problem. I'm sorry, but many people tried lot's of strategies and the truth is that none succeeded yet.
There should be a web of trust for SSL certificates integrated into browsers rather than this bizarre and complex OS/browser-distributed international list of certificate authorities. Than onion sites could have a chain of trust to the end-user without centralized trust systems.
There used to be StartSSL chain-o-trust back-in-days. Centralized, but working. Maybe one day someone creates decentralized one - and browser supporting it. Me breath is holding not :-/
Cool but I still think dark.fail is the way to go reputation-wise and it should be your tor browser homepage.
Thanks for sharing