pull down to refresh

Yeeeeeppp
The whole idea of a "benevolent social planner", which is what the so-called "market failures" are often compared to, is a total myth.
reply
This guy knew it long ago. G.K. Chesterton:
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
reply
Fantastic quote
reply
Every time I think of the petty tyrants of the world this quote burbles up in my mind.
reply
trafficwaves.org
reply
for the people who would prefer to just click a link:
reply
Nice opening line:
“Market failure,” like many technical terms, is a misleading label. Not all ways in which markets fail count as market failure and market failure occurs in many contexts other than markets.
reply
Yes, some economists are finally starting to notice this and break their Keynesian conditioning.
reply
Market failure exists because individuals are making decisions much of whose cost or benefit goes to someone else. That situation sometimes occurs on the private market but there it is the exception, not the rule. Most goods are ordinary private goods, so the producer can convert much of the benefit to the buyer into a benefit to himself via the price he charges. Most production uses inputs — labor, raw materials, capital, land — that the producer can only use if he compensates their owners for what they give up by letting him use them. In the standard model of perfect competition, which assumes away problems such as public goods and externalities, what the producer is paid for a good turns out to be just what it is worth to the purchaser, what he buys inputs for to be just what they are worth to the seller, hence his private benefit is precisely equal to the social benefit, the total effect of his actions summed over everyone.
This is very agreeable to me. The problems are not with markets but interference in markets. The real interferer is the state and it’s “I know better than you what you need” propensities. Hayek said it in Pretense of Knowledge and he was absolutely correct. They don’t know and are just pretending to know.
reply
Qual falha está tendo no mercado
reply
I don’t understand your question
reply