deleted by author
pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @OT 21 May
How do you pronounce her last name?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Catcher 21 May
Great question for ama)
reply
74 sats \ 0 replies \ @21mmforthe21st 21h freebie
Hough like "tough"!
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon 21 May
Do you think reality conforms to mind or mind conforms to reality?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @21mmforthe21st 21h
Tough question! Apologies if this is pay-walled, but the conclusion has been rattling around in my head recently. https://academic.oup.com/oep/article-abstract/32/3/353/2360840?redirectedFrom=PDF
In my thesis, I write a lot about language, which I think skews how we interpet and perceive reality. I guess currently I am leaning towards our mind shaping how we see reality, so thath might be "reality conforms to mind."
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 10h
Do you think there's a universal logical constraint placed on different languages, and such a constraint must be logically prior and necessary for saying anything meaningful, otherwise any sentence in any language would be mere gibberish? Or do you agree with the historicist that "everything is possible", and that interpretation and expression are mere subjective creations?
"One can say, of course, that something can be "a" and "non-a" at the same time, or that "and" means this rather than something else. But one cannot undo the law of contradiction; and one cannot undo the real definition of "and." For simply by virtue of acting with a physical body in physical space we invariably affirm the law of contradiction and invariably display our true constructive knowledge of the meaning of "and" and "or.""
--Hoppe
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 21 May
What's her stance on the current spam wars?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 20 May
Great. Looking forward.
reply