pull down to refresh

saw this pop up today and was thinking about gene editing
(Doctors in the US have become the first to treat a baby with a customised gene-editing therapy after diagnosing the child with a severe genetic disorder that kills about half of those affected in early infancy. last time I heard much in media it was when the Chinese scientist did a bit of sneaky gene editing.)
do you think gene editing will be the norm in the future, maybe standard for disease, and a premium for designer babies?
285 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 5h
Yes. It will start for correcting disease but eventually will become designer babies.
reply
I think known cosmetic alterations, like eye or hair color, will probably roll out very early as well.
In principle, it's not so different from selecting embryos with known traits, which is already done.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 5h
I already am a designer baby.
reply
105 sats \ 2 replies \ @Aardvark 5h
Gattaca gonna be a real thing.
reply
117 sats \ 1 reply \ @BlokchainB 5h
Great movie
reply
149 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 4h
I never saved anything for the swim back.
reply
65 sats \ 1 reply \ @coinhome 5h
I definitely think gene editing will become more accessible over time. It's an ethical dilemma we'll have to confront.
reply
i think for illness and stuff it;s not an ethical question, but for cosmetic enhancements things get weird
reply
when you notice wide hips and symmetrical features, you're selecting for genes
reply
Why do most people cringe at the idea of using gene editing for cosmetics?
reply
I dunno I’ve read there are massive risks around crispr tech. They might cause more disease than they cure.
reply
I think it will be common place. Hopefully it will be ethical
reply