pull down to refresh

lots more times actually: #981142
reply
Demonstrates a need for better redundancy checking than just a link. šŸ˜‰
I checked top level posts for about 3 seconds and didn’t see it (likely because the previous posts were relatively old), but I’d say the user shouldn’t even have to do that. Gotta make it dead simple.
reply
100%
reply
Right. I also checked before posting #981528 but Didn't find the link or any similar posts.
It's also true that I didn't search with the keywords before posting. It helps.
reply
I didn’t search for keywords either, but I don’t think people should have to do that first. :)
Should be done where the link is posted. Just for poops and giggles, I used another link, and ā€œSimilarā€ didn’t pick it up.
That’s the point of failure which needs to be improved. I’m also not sure if making it default collapsible (vs. collapsed) is the best route, but I can also see a case for minimalism.
reply
I don’t think people should have to do that first
Yes, I agree. I also agree that Similar should pick up by the phrases, which I guess only picks up by one word. I'm sure @ek and @k00b or someone else has already made a issue for it and it should be better very soon.
As of now, I think we should better search with the post title phrase to see for similar posted earlier. This is a little more time sucking but it actually saved me share at least three already posted similar news yesterday.
reply