Compromise on data limits8.3%
Knot operators win25.0%
Core devs prevail58.3%
Bitcoin forks again8.3%
24 votes \ poll ended
pull down to refresh
65 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 8 May
How about remain the same?
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @BITC0IN 8 May
Bitcoin Core node count share will decrease as Knots increases to 21%
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ZezzebbulTheMysterious 9 May
There really is no reason not to remove the OP_RETURN limit.
The pandoras box of indistinguishably can never be closed, and the attitude of destruction will never preclude grinding, even at great economic loss. it becomes one of harm minimization. Your adversary will always have a finite resources, we have to play a longer game.
The strategy that increases protocol longevity (by minimizing active resource cost like [cpu+mem]) is the optimum strategy.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @alt 8 May
No idea what the OP_RETURN debate is even about (didn't even know there was a debate going on until I saw this poll).
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @LibertasBR 8 May
Just the way it is now.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @denlillaapan 8 May
How about someone explain to me a) the relevance/practicality of the debate, and b) what the conflict is really about.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 8 May
here I made an explanation in few memes #974547
reply