I don’t know the source of this line, but while that might have been true before this debate started, there have been at least a couple dozen more OP_RETURN outputs beyond the limit.

What is the source of this line please:
"Audience are too dumb to understand this”. But most of us can appreciate: only 7 OP_RETURN larger than 83 byte this year, and the rest millions are <= 83 bytes. "


hgw39

More facts about how OP_RETURN limits are working well as designed, and two analogies:

“car safety belt doesn’t work, because someone died with seat belt on”

or: people can still take effort to climb over your fence, doesn’t mean all fences in the community should be removed.

"Audience are too dumb to understand this”. But most of us can appreciate: only 7 OP_RETURN larger than 83 byte this year, and the rest millions are <= 83 bytes. (Jason Hughes)

bitcoin

Quick questions about OP_RETURN? Quick answers here.

tidwell

More facts about how OP_RETURN limits are working well as designed, and two analogies:
“car safety belt doesn’t work, because someone died with seat belt on”
or: people can still take effort to climb over your fence, doesn’t mean all fences in the community should be removed. 

"Audience are too dumb to understand this”. But most of us can appreciate: only 7 OP_RETURN larger than 83 byte this year, and the rest millions are <= 83 bytes. (Jason Hughes)

