pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @OT 3 May \ parent \ on: If we 'fix the filters'... what happens with transactions... bitcoin
Increasing the dust limit to 1000 sats would work.
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 3 May
Dust limits are mempool policy. It doesn’t affect what can go into blocks.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @028559d218 OP 3 May
so... even if standard mempool policy was changed to 1000 sats indicating anything less than 1000 sats is 'dust'...
doesn't that make the current dust situation worse? the current dust outputs of 546 sats become unspendable.
and someone who wants to spend 999 sats (just shy of a dollar) can't. isn't that censorship?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 3 May
doesn't that make the current dust situation worse? the current dust outputs of 546 sats become unspendable.
Why do you think they become unspendable? Again, dust limits are mempool policy.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @028559d218 OP 3 May
not unspendable but if the vast majority of nodes enforce that 'dust limit' in their individual mempools, then yes spending those outputs becomes harder. did i misunderstand this?
the whole 'debate' as of late isn't about 'what goes into blocks' it's about mempool policy
reply