I like my finance simple, and don't like when the techno mumble-jumble starts to obscure the purpose of the thing. When they begin to talk about coupons, and convertibles, and whatnot it feels like they're trying to fool you into something that is actually simple, but obscured by technical jargon, pretty much like what shitcoiners do.

When Strategy or whatever the company name is buys bitcoin, it's not with their own money, they take it from investors that buy some type of instrument, because as I see it Microstrategy is a company that was pretty lame in its business, but now that it buys BTC is pretty successful. These investors are buying said instruments because they expect some return, right? So basically what they're doing is good'ole leverage, or what am I getting wrong? They buy BTC with money that isn't theirs, and the people who lend them is expecting some return? The only way I see that being done is by selling BTC at a later stage, creating even more volatility in the next bear market.

And now there's Capital21 with Jack M doing the same? So the game is basically to find whatever fiat at hand and buy BTC like there's no tomorrow, but all that is with the expectation to sell it a future date, or why would someone give them money instead of buying BTC themselves?

What am I getting wrong? Please explain it to me like if I was buying the ETH dip.