pull down to refresh

I disagree with that. Even if the protocol were agnostic which is debatable because that is a lot of power and influence over the community to go along with what Saylor wants, but even if it did, one entity holding that much supply would massively restrict the free and open flow of Bitcoin around the world. It would essentially create a defacto Bitcoin central bank that people and large entities needed permission from to get access to its reserves.
Every company, every individual, every business, every family office has the option to buy Bitcoin today. It is widely available.
There is what 400 trillion of wealth out there and still that capital hasn't flowed into Bitcoin but remains in inferior stores of value?
This is not the fault of Saylor or Strategy.
To the contrary it's easy to create a seed phrase, buy Bitcoin from a cex or dex, withdraw it for 25 cents and custody it yourself in a shoebox. And each sat in self-custody is verifiably not available to strategy or the ETFs.
Plus utxo ownership does not change consensus rules. That is a function of nodes and to a lesser degree miners.
reply