pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch 24 Apr \ parent \ on: Chaincode Labs is doing politics with Bitcoin consensus changes (CTV) bitcoin
In case it’s not obvious, I’m not my former manager’s keeper and was not privy to his call log or the content of any phone calls he may have had. Given the accuracy of your opening post on this topic, please excuse me if I take anything you claim with a grain of salt.
I may have been paid by Chaincode in the past, but I can confirm that I independently came to the decision to limit my attention to you.
I’m not my former manager’s keeper and was not privy to his call log or the content of any phone calls he may have had.
So there is no denial that the call happens. That’s a point.
I may have been paid by Chaincode in the past, but I can confirm that I independently came to the decision to limit my attention to you.
Go to read any deontological playbook, past money paid to someone are often retained as factor indicating a bias on a subject.
If you have made your opinion on myself based on information that you have been exposed to during your paid time at Chaincode, that’s enough.
No independence of yours there given your present organization have been set by a people who have been privy to what did happen. But I’m not going to say more, I’m a man of honor.
reply