pull down to refresh

Federations are scam or fedimint is scam? I don't get it. I had Fedimint tokens in the past when I was playing with and haven't see them disappearing. Are the Fedimint developers scammers? I don't understand. What is USAID abbreviation for? What does it have to do with Fedimint or federations?
Both, federation is a term used by scammers in the context of Bitcoin, there's no such thing. There are multisigs but that doesn't make custody federated, Liquid for example... you don't know how many parties are needed to collude to rug you. All they need to do is turn off the gateway, or one party could hold several keys in the multisig.
Fedimints themselves, as of recently, aren't even multi-sig. The mutiny incident where people lost access to their sats was from a single member going down.
Just because you are issued shitcoins that represent claims on Bitcoin doesn't mean the Bitcoin is federated, Fedimint tokens are inherently worthless shitcoins with a promise that you might be able to redeem for Bitcoin from a centralized gateway.
The Fedimint developers are Blockstream, purveyors of affinity scams like Liquid they claim to be an L2, and have seemingly burned hundreds of millions in funding that came from god knows where on products that's only function is to obfuscating custodians.
Fedi is a product based on Fedimint, their scamming was even more overt, taking the Blockstream model and attempting to apply to to smaller NGO "communities"
reply
Isn't cashu the same (on the relevant points you said, I am ignoring the rest)?
reply
Cashu doesn't pretend to be Federated, so in that way it's not scammy. It's custodial tech, which is fine if transparent.
Cashu is simply retarded on a technical level, that's better than being a scam though.
The knock on Cashu is that it's overly complex and the only appeal it has is to virtue signaling privacy larps that think you can get privacy from a custodian.
reply