pull down to refresh
23 sats \ 4 replies \ @028559d218 11h \ parent \ on: Is choosing not to have kids the most ethical act today? AskSN
I understand what you're saying, but by that logic...
If higher birth rates means greater economic development, isn't the solution then for Europe and the US to have large amount of immigration from higher-birthrate continents?
For Europe the African continent, lots of immigration, and for the US, immigration from Central and South America?
If higher birth rates means greater economic development, isn't the solution then for Europe and the US to have large amount of immigration from higher-birthrate continents? causality there is definitely iffie. Don't think the jury is out on that yet.
But yes, as a matter of patching over fiscal and retirement systems during this demographic chaos, yes, that is the answer. (but few people in Western countries want that, so... square that circle for me).
reply
America has historically had the highest intake of immigrants and America is the richest country on Earth. Is there a contradiction that I'm just missing somewhere?
reply
Well my point is that if 'more people' make countries wealthier... then more immigration should make countries wealthier too.
But if you listen to Mr Trump, immigration to the US is the cause of half the country's problems. It doesn't make sense
reply
Oh, I can explain that pretty easily: Trump is a complete ignoramus on economics.
It is possible, though, for the source of problems to also be the source of gains. That's consistent with the idea of tradeoffs.
reply