pull down to refresh

There's lots to be said for gamefied learning that garners the interest of the child-student; much of it is critical.
While the adult pupils might have felt infantilized at first, the sats system emboldened some of them to try where they hadn't been otherwise encouraged since they then clearly perceived themselves to be earning something tied indirectly to class benchmarks and expectations, which they are all there to fulfill anyway. Just as transgressions come with real, and now a clearly seen consequence, so is desired class conduct rewarded in kind.
You might be surprised as I was to find that, place enough adults in the same room to discuss a topic and many of them forget tenets of basic courtesy. The benefit to the facilitator using a rewards-based system is that, the enforcement of the class ethics becomes a game and not a pedantic truism.
this territory is moderated
What I think you're describing is a teacher-led education system, and your observations are correct within that framework.
Flip your model, and notice how this changes. Alfie Kohn's Point is precisely that, in a student-led education, a genuine interest is sufficient for learning and cooperation to happen spontaneously.
reply
The system is not expressly teacher-led, but it does assume there being a set of ethics expected of participants, which are in place irrespective of whether they are observed or not. I would call the class being studied neither teacher nor student centred, but I'd sooner call it rule centered. Read my post and you'll understand.
reply
I read the post, but probably misunderstood. Unlike you, I have no practical experience, and all I know is from the book I've mentioned, hence it being my main point of reference. This last comment of yours brings more clarity, and widens my worldview. Thanks.
reply