Fulcrum is a faster alternative to electrs \ stacker news ~bitcoin

This was flagged as a duplicate but I have posted the link as it has been updated to account for Fulcrum.

Even though the link is the same, the content has changed in s meaningful way and I wonder if this should be accounted for in the algorithm.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 1 Feb 2022

All good! This is why I kind of want duplicates to just be a warning more than prohibited or too too expensive.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @el_zonte OP 2 Feb 2022

great - and I'm impressed you picked this up since I got your n@me wrong .. d'oh!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @CypherPoet 2 Feb 2022

What do you think about having a link to the original post in a potentially duplicated post?

This could help incentivize more boosting of the original content if people don’t find the new post to be of any additional value.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cointastical 1 Feb 2022

Thanks for all the details! Did not hear about Fulcrum before, but it seems to be a bcash-first product supporting the ?ElectrumCash v1.4.5 protocol. Curious did you test native SegWit and Taproot address support?

Both native Segwit and Taproot working well. The developer appears relatively chain agnostic.

It would be interesting to see if ZRAM can improve indexing time with the Fulcrum fast sync parameter!