pull down to refresh
55 sats \ 2 replies \ @mtk4000 15 Apr
What is the long-term solution to this? DATUM? I'm interested in the prospect of fully decentralized mining pools (braidpool), but I don't know how feasible they are.
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @zapsammy 15 Apr
stacker.news pool! let's stack hashers!
#917675
#944296
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 15 Apr
DATUM and Stratum V2 - it's early days for them both and adoption has been slow - but the capability is there. With any luck most hash producers will start producing their own block templates in time. There just isn't much incentive to change.
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 15 Apr
Ocean has had some good luck lately. It has grown too, but still less than 1% of the total hash rate.
At least is is being talked about and there are small movements countering centralization like solo mining and Datum/SV2.
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 15 Apr
appearance
vs reality
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @hasherstacker 15 Apr
The mining it is supposed to be decentralized . The way it was originally designed to be decentralized, but that's not how it is now. Centralization it is a disease
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Dkryptoenth 16 Apr
Bitcoin mining centralization refers to the concentration of mining power (hashrate) in the hands of a few entities, which goes against the decentralized ethos of Bitcoin. Here’s a quick breakdown of what that means and why it matters:
What Is Mining Centralization?
Bitcoin mining uses a proof-of-work (PoW) system where miners compete to solve cryptographic puzzles and add new blocks to the blockchain.
Ideally, mining should be decentralized, with many independent miners around the world.
Centralization happens when a few large mining pools or operations control a significant portion of the total hashrate.
Why Is This a Concern?
- Security Risks:
If one entity or a small group controls over 50% of the hashrate, they could execute a 51% attack, allowing them to double-spend coins or censor transactions.
- Censorship and Governance:
Centralized miners might be influenced by governments or corporations, leading to censorship or protocol manipulation.
- Geographical Risks:
Concentration in certain regions (e.g., China before the 2021 crackdown) made Bitcoin vulnerable to regulatory decisions, power outages, or political issues.
- Barrier to Entry:
Specialized hardware (ASICs) and access to cheap electricity give large players an advantage, making it hard for small or hobbyist miners to compete.
Current State (as of 2024)
Most mining power is still concentrated in a handful of large mining pools (e.g., Foundry USA, Antpool, F2Pool).
The move of mining operations out of China has somewhat decentralized the geography, spreading across the U.S., Kazakhstan, Russia, and other regions.
However, pool-level centralization is still high, as many individual miners contribute hashrate through major mining pools.
Solutions & Mitigations
Stratum V2: A mining protocol that allows miners more control over block templates, reducing the influence of pool operators.
Decentralized Mining Pools: Projects like Ocean, Eligius, or P2Pool aim to make mining pools themselves more decentralized.
Renewable Energy & Home Mining: Efforts to democratize mining through lower-cost, sustainable energy sources and plug-and-play hardware.
Want me to expand on any of these points or include data/stats from recent mining pool shares?
reply