Going out on a limb here based on the comments. I hold the belief that there is a universal objective truth. How close we get to that is a deviation from our understanding of objective truth but moral relativists drive me mad. Similar to the post talking about cardinal sins, everything can be reduced to objectively good or bad, true or untrue. The more gray your interpretation or action, the more likely it is to be objectively untrue or bad. Not saying there aren’t exceptions, but usually those gray areas are preceded themselves by prior infractions or deviations from goodness or truth that necessitate the ambiguity.

Not sure I presented that well, but I just came to fight back the George RR Martin types.

I’ll take my reality black and white Tolkien, thank you very much.