pull down to refresh

All civilizations have up to now been based on private ownership of the means of production. In the past civilization and private ownership have been linked together. If history could teach us anything, it would be that private property is inextricably linked with civilization.
Every living thing—whether it’d be a single cell, or a collection of them like a human, or a collection of humans like a community or a company—is in a constant cycle of production and consumption-use. Production and consumption, and all action, is just a transformation or relocation of “matter into more advantageous shapes,” guided by information. Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk said,
To “produce”: what does this mean? It has been so often said by economists that the creation of goods is not the bringing into existence of materials that hitherto have not existed—is not “creation” in the true sense of the word, but only a fashioning of imperishable matter into more advantageous shapes…
These cycles of production and consumption use information that leads to profitability. In other words, more production of wealth than consumption allows life to continue to continue and grow.
The information that coordinates the modern global socioeconomic order, or what the great founder of the Austrian School of economics, Carl Menger, and British philosopher Herbert Spencer, both referred to as the “The Social Organism,” emerges and spreads via “economic competition,” which itself emerges from the tradition of private property….
Thus, from private property emerges: 1) the economic competition that discovers and spreads superior information and order; 2) the freedom to live and order our lives as we wish since no one else can coerce-reorder our property without our consent; and, 3) the “rational economic calculation” that allows us to best ensure that our plans are profitable and thus wealth-maximizing and life-increasing. Mises said, “The continued existence of society depends upon private property.”
As much as the progressive/lefty/collectivist/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderers would like to deny it, private property and only private property makes life civil. Freedom and exchange, based upon private property makes life comfortable through competition for resources that you, a producer, have on hand from previous production. If you deny private property, you are necessarily denying private ownership of self, which is an absurdity since you have to own yourself to think and move. So, when the progressive/lefty/collectivist/Marxist/socialist/communist/murderers deny private ownership of property, they are denying everything in civil existance.
I’d love for Hoppe’s insights to catch on more broadly.
Private property rights are the only coherent legal framework consistent with peaceful conflict resolution.
reply
Private property rights are the only coherent legal framework consistent with peaceful conflict resolution.
With that sort of resolution, I don't think many states would be interested in enforcing private property rights. The states are there to hoover up all the private property that they can get their greedy hands on to put into their pockets. The only way Hoppe's theories could be applied is through popular action of the people.
reply
I agree. They’ll probably get enacted in some sort of fringe covenant community first, like a seastead or liberland.
reply
They might even get enacted in someplace like El Salvador or Argentina, if the current state leaders keep to their philosophies.
reply
Maybe partially, but you were right about no state ever allowing it.
reply
Sure, it would get in the way of their rapacious looting of the common people. I think Bastiat had it right in his writings.