A tweet suggesting a donor spent 1.2 million to flip polymarket, in order to support narrative created by soft polling that Mark Carney is taking the lead in Canada's upcoming election.
I guess they could go this low.
Queues the Guy Swann 'Give a Shit Matrix'
You see, I'm not actually concerned whether this happened. But even the possibility - no the liklihood - that it did, and the fact that it is even being discussed is quite frankly absurd.
If it's not proof enough of the cronyism going on up North, then let me tell you something about a little place called Ontario, where public servants who make over 100k are literally put on something called the sunshine list and public sector employee salaries were, on average, 34% more than those in the private sector.1
Add president's of universities and CEOs of hospitals are among the highest paid people, earning upwards of 3-400k annually into the bargain and isn't that the literal definition of a centrally-planned, socialist society?
So doesn't surprise me that some mysterious cantillionaire would try to flip the prediction market?
Not in the least.
š” Did you figure out which give a shit quadrant said donors would fall into?
the post
Just a bit of math, If someone bought 3 million shares of Carney, avg $0.40 per share, Cost = 3m x 0.40 = $1.2 million to flip Polymarket for Carney. 3m on the high side if we take in consideration a mild fight.
Money well spent to create the narrative to support the soft polling Canadian MSM is peddling.
Pierre will likely win this, don't be fooled.
Footnotes
-
taken from this study ā©