Here's a nice story, roughly a follow-up to yesterday's wealth observation (#929023): a WSJ weekend read on five normal yet remarkably wealthy men who retired early.
Somehow the reporters at WSJ managed to convince them to show exact figures and financial situations.
All of them report no/low debt, and astonishing amounts of funds in
a) real estate,
b) business investments,
c) various retirement funding programs, ranging from IRAs and 401(k)s to annuities.
(No bitcoin mention... total shock!)
None of these guys are what we would call "poor," the lowest spender (~65k a year), having a few million in the bank.
Noticiably too, and to some extent illustrating the hubris of the FIRE movement (financial independence, retire early), they were all successful managers or high-ranking in this or that profession... you can't be an ordinary schmuck and amass enough funds to comfortably retire in your mid-50s. That math just won't work out.
Anyway, what I liked the most were the relatable life stories, the happy pictures, and the way that these people have structured their financial arrangements to allow for the lives they want to live. Very inspiring.
The title is stupid, though. This is emphatically not what retiring is like for the vast, vast majority of people; these are extreme, top-1% type stories. It's extraordinary financial circumstances that let a person retire 10-15 years "early."
non-paywalled: https://archive.md/jzXRF