pull down to refresh

35 sats \ 1 reply \ @siggy47 27 Mar \ on: Hydrus - Automating lightning liquidity management lightning
Dumb question: If you're trying to experiment with a routing node, I would assume if you choose to automate, you must pick one option, or else chaos would ensue? For instance, try hydrus for opening channels while using LNDg to automate fees?
write
preview
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @aftermath OP 27 Mar
As long as the other tools do not open/close channels I think it should be fine.
Hydrus in particular will base its decisions based on the current node and network states, and will try to be between the configured number of channels. It currently does not make changes to routing policies, although I might change that to facilitate things even more.
So the worst case scenario is that the other automation tool is opening/closing channels to keep the node in a certain state different than Hydrus. That would cause a conflict and both agents would keep making changes one after the other.
reply