pull down to refresh

We've removed the leaderboard. It's been the source of the most entitled and vitriolic behavior to date. My sense is it puts people in a competitive mood which is generally bad for discourse. We'll see how it goes.
Multi auth has been refactored to be more reliable (via @ek and @sox).
You can search with just a @nym or ~territory now (via @SimpleStacker).
We auto post the hottest stories to X and nostr every hour now. So you should see us on those channels a bit more.
We don't erroneously provide lnurl-verify urls on un-proxied invoices anymore.
We prevent resubmission (double paying) when paying a bounty.


Since starting the Open Source Contributor Award Rules (OSCARs), we've paid a total of 20.5m sats to 44 contributors for 206 contributions! View a nearly up to date list of contribution awards here: https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/blob/master/awards.csv
(I'll try to payout any completed unpaid bounties by EoW.)

Previous release: #917048

Multi auth isn’t multi factor auth, right? That’s still to come?
reply
158 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 26 Mar
Yep, they're different things. We still plan to do multi-factor auth.
reply
Fantastic!
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 26 Mar
Oh lol, you are right. I knew the name was bad in some way haha
Yeah, this is only for switching between accounts. There’s no MFA yet (but we have a draft PR).
reply
Cool, excited to see it! IIRC I am the one who opened the original feature request too lol clearly I’m into these things
reply
We've removed the leaderboard. It's been the source of the most entitled and vitriolic behavior to date. My sense is it puts people in a competitive mood which is generally bad for discourse. We'll see how it goes.
In the immortal words of the cast of Hulu's The Great: Huzzah!
reply
My zaps to sn@stacker.news are all failing on nostr.
reply
Ah, @sn doesn't have a wallet attached. I updated it. Thanks!
reply
Hmm, I kind of miss the feature of seeing how much rewards I'm slated to get. I like licking my lips in anticipation.
reply
Looks good to me
reply
Leaderboard is the easiest way to see stacking vs spending ratio. That will be missed. Otherwise it is worth a shot.
reply
222 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 26 Mar
We'll provide retrospective stats in the future. Plan is for an end of day recap notification.
reply
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 26 Mar
I enjoyed seeing how many sats I've cumulatively sent on this site.
reply
But it does involve a few extra clicks
reply
I know I can find it in statistics. I just isn't as easy as clicking the leaderboard and finding out I spent way too many sats. Haha
reply
finally! 🥁
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @nout 27 Mar
There was a leaderboard? I never noticed that... I know about this https://stacker.news/top/stackers/week
reply
It was on the /rewards page. Link at the bottom.
reply
I am glad that as a platform, SN is looking to improve, always leading us to continue working and sharing quality content.
reply
reply
All that's left is to completely remove the rewards to fulfill the prophecy!
reply
I don't think that's a good idea, my friend.
reply
because you are on SN only to assmilk ?
reply
Yeah, probably not. That was SN kicking the bucket, and it's been on its way out for a year, you know?
reply
good, that is real stacking, when you do not spend your sats on meaningless things. Now stackers will think twice before they will post some garbage...
reply
I wish we could just see our own rank with a quick rundown of the day.
reply
We'll provide retrospective stats in the future.
reply
Seriously though, shouldn't there be an easier way to see our daily earnings and spend? Is the top stackers the only gig going?
reply
We'll probably remove top stackers by value eventually as well.
reply
Top stackers by value is kinda like a rough leaderboard, so yeah, makes sense to ditch that too. And on that link you sent, it'd be way better if it just showed today's stuff by default, not the last 24 hours.
reply
deleted by author