pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @expatriotic 21 Mar \ parent \ on: Regarding misplaced posts in ~crypto crypto
I wish I had read this before making the ~monero territory haha...
It's good to take a peek into the psychology of it.
At the end of the day though, 50k sats is just really steep for something niche. Unfortunately, it's like the Joe Rogan effect, or the long tail effect, to be more technical. Similar to the 80:20 rule. Basically, the ~bitcoin territory will garner 80+% of the posts and thus make @k00b filthy rich (speculating). Meanwhile others in the long tail are going to have to be okay taking a loss every month (again, speculating).
In fact, I'm surprised there are as many territories as they are. People got loads of cash sats to burn it seems.
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 21 Mar
I'm -13m sats (that's a minus sign).
Only six territories are profitable for the month. afaik we haven't crossed more than 10 be profitable any month yet.
My plan is to make territories invite only (inviters must be existing territory founders). That way people don't feel blindsided - the inviter is like a concierge.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @expatriotic 21 Mar
I'm -13m sats (that's a minus sign).
Wow. That's a lot... How is that possible though? Is that you personally or in regards to the ~bitcoin territory. I was specifically referring to that territory. Your overall deficit could just be a habit of zapping others. Presumably if you were ONLY the ~bitcoin territory founder, you'd be positive.
But I take your point that your not "filthy rich" from your general use of SN ;)
reply