Thank you for your comment.

If the sources Matt provided (or the Politico source provided in another comment) actually supported the literal confiscation of savings... or the taking of savings to 'fund the war' then I would support 100% his message.

But that's not what the Politico article says or the ones he references. An EU-wide credit union to increase investment and venture capital... is not savings confiscation.

Now when a government 'prints money' in a way savings are being confiscated. When the bank 'loans out' savings in a way they are being used for 'other things' at some risk to the depositors and someone, somewhere is paying for that risk or insurance... yes there is a story there and a message.

However that's not what he's talking about and in any case those are different things.