pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @justin_shocknet OP 16 Mar \ parent \ on: Scaling DEBUNKED: No More Than 5-10 Million Can Use Bitcoin, EVER! bitcoin
write
preview
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @moneyball 16 Mar

Take the L and remove the post. It is completely inaccurate and misleading.

reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @justin_shocknet OP 16 Mar

Then it should be a warm invite to forkers to lay out their math on how many users need to be accommodated, shouldn't it?

Even off as I was, it stands that supply distribution is the scaling limitation, not the absence of centralized transaction pooling toward completely unquantified scaling virtue signals

reply
17 sats \ 3 replies \ @moneyball 16 Mar

I agree it is an interesting framework. But most people seem misled by the title. So maybe edit?

reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet OP 16 Mar

I would if I could, cc @k00b

Good to see the conceptual interest, a v2 might be warranted with detailed introspection into possible supply distribution scenarios...

Scarcity is so insane its impossible to truly account for the fact that every person with more than 20k sats is removing exponential numbers of other people from the user-candidate pool

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 16 Mar

Edit windows are limited to 10m until we add perpetual edits.

Closest thing IMO would be to write a comment with revisions, click ..., and pin the comment to the top of the thread.

reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet OP 16 Mar

pinned comments sound like a good solution

reply