Yep, makes sense. Also, the writing style of one author may not speak to one group of people, but it may speak to another group of people. The only way Bitcoin can reach many different groups is if it has many different authors with many different backgrounds and many different styles.

That being said, I do think that the space can become a bit of a self-referential echo chamber, as any space can be. I've often critiqued academia for becoming increasingly self-referential. Let's hope Bitcoiners don't become equally so.