I play a little lightning blackjack (with a few sats)
Check out stacker news (to tip or be tipped and make the occasional post)
And also experiment with Lightning... moving sats around, trying out new wallets, even using Bitrefill occasionally (Cheap Steam gift cards are cool)
But the truth is that I rarely have to touch on-chain I just don't need to.
Occasionally to open another Lightning channel (3 or 4 are enough) or withdraw from the exchange after DCA but that's about it.
And even withdrawals... from the exchange can be on Lightning so what's the point of 'on-chain' if I don't need it?
Isn't this what we wanted and how this stuff scales anyway?
Blockchains don't scale so... If "the whole world" will be on Bitcoin then as a percentage, touching on-chain will be relatively rare, except for opening lightning channels or making large transfers in and out of 'cold storage.'
I use Bitcoin every single day.
But the truth is that I rarely have to touch on-chain I just don't need to.
Occasionally to open another Lightning channel (3 or 4 are enough) or withdraw from the exchange after DCA but that's about it.
And even withdrawals... from the exchange can be on Lightning so what's the point of 'on-chain' if I don't need it?
Isn't this what we wanted and how this stuff scales anyway?
Blockchains don't scale so...
If "the whole world" will be on Bitcoin then as a percentage, touching on-chain will be relatively rare, except for opening lightning channels or making large transfers in and out of 'cold storage.'
So what's the issue? Thoughts?