pull down to refresh

after reviewing many different proposals and discussions over the last 2 weeks, it seems clear that CTV + CSFS is the next upgrade to Bitcoin.
Steven Roose's proposed roadmap, while presently short on specific detail as it gets drafted more formally, is the best way for us to get there. His proposal is simple, and is a high level roadmap with three steps:
  • enable CTV and CHECKSIGFROMSTACK asap
  • Great Script Restoration (includes CAT)
  • upgrade CTV with TXHASH + add some form of direct introspection + ECMUL/TWEAKADD
the best way for us to get there
The "where" is centrally coordinated shitcoins affinity scamming as Bitcoin scaling under false scaling narratives
Can't tell if this VTXO scam is a coordinated attack or there are just that many idiots
reply
reply
VTXO's are literally centrally coordinated shitcoins being shilled as scaling.
Blatant scamming, not a euphemism. Exactly what I'd expect from pronouns in the bio.
reply
VTXO's are literally centrally coordinated shitcoins being shilled as scaling
no technical explanation only ad hom
pRoNoUnS iN tHe BiO
and more ad hom
exactly the quality of argumentation I expect from a time scammer
reply
You had a chance to argue my OP re: the statement of VTXO's being centrally coordinated shitcoins, but are clearly confused about what Bitcoin is and couldn't.
reply
You had a chance to reply to my OP re: the statement of VTXO's being centrally coordinated shitcoins
If you shared a full explanation of why you claim that VTXOs are a scam, and that explanation was not supported by opinions, factual errors, or logical fallacies, then I would consider responding to the claim directly. But that's not what you did. You did a drive-by name-calling and left it at that. There is nothing there of substance to respond to. Time scamming.
but are clearly confused about what Bitcoin is
Yet another dead in the water feature fork - these niche circlejerks with their echo chamber 'consensus' and distinctly troll-ish promotion are noise, tbh.
reply
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @02d769cb73 17h
nah
reply
reply