With extreme arrogance and entitlement comes never expecting to be held accountable or subjected to any scrutiny.
pull down to refresh
32 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 24 Feb
Yes, of course, they are getting rid of the evidence. Criminals will criminal. This just goes to show that those doing this were criminals to start and will do anything to avoid being caught.
One ex-prosecutor said he preferred evidence of them destroying evidence to circumstantial evidence of the crime in the first place. It shows that they did wrong and knew they were doing wrong. It is better for the prosecutions.
I hope that they get to see the prosecutors up-close and personal real soon now.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 24 Feb
It's part of the same entitled unaccountable attitude. They're accustomed to their political protectors stepping in at this point and keeping them out of trouble.
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic 25 Feb
It looks like all of their protectors and the protector’s money have dried up and blown away. Could that be all of those NGOs, newspapers, very rich (by suspicious means) donors and USAID could no longer function without the traditional slush funds? Did Trump put a wooden stake through their hearts? I think we should all get out the popcorn for this Jacksonian production.
reply
28 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 24 Feb
Their loyalty isnt to the american people, or the government, it is too themselves.
They are burning evidence so they dont also become incriminated.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 24 Feb
Yep. Better to be convicted of mishandling records than whatever was in those records.
reply
27 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 24 Feb
It would be interesting to see all the names that pop up on those records.
reply
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 24 Feb
I'd like Google Trends statistics on which agencies are doing the most searches for "criminal defense attorney" and "offshore bank account"
reply