pull down to refresh

For 30 years I have worked as an academic physician treating patients, teaching trainees of all levels, and conducting research. I find my job tremendously gratifying spiritually, emotionally, and intellectually, which is why it is so painful to watch it decline in front of my eyes.
In recent years forces arising from inside and outside my profession have worked to degrade core tenets of medical practice like physician autonomy, professional excellence, and the physician-patient relationship. These forces are succeeding in large measure because of increasingly centralized power among a variety of actors and a suffocating blanket of regulations and bureaucracy. The result? Physician dissatisfaction and burnout and deterioration of the medical profession. As physicians go so goes the health care system, so this is a crisis that affects every American.
I believe, however, that it is not too late to reverse this trend. That is why I would like to bring to the attention of the incoming Trump administration, which ran on a platform of reform, my personal list of restorative strategies. I believe instituting reform in the specific areas I outline below would correct some of the worst problems that physicians are currently facing, reinvigorate the medical profession, and improve medical care.
In large part, the key to succeeding involves decentralizing and demonopolizing power and rolling back regulatory hurdles within the system. My list is by no means exhaustive (for example, I don’t touch on reimbursement issues) nor is it presented in any particular order, but it is one that speaks directly to my personal experience:
This physician has some pet-peeves about how the medical establishment runs things. He notes that the centralization and monopolization of medicine by government fiat in the laws a regulations promulgated by government after lobbying by the Rockefellers and their organizations are detrimental to the bottom-up nature of medicine. The healers definitely need healing by pulling away all the excess encumbrances the government has encrusted them with.
Yep same with education, and likely any profession honestly.
The more government gets involved, the more red tape, the more centralization, the more corruption, the more mission drift.
I'll add to that: it's not just government either. It's the fact that in healthcare and education people don't pay with their own money. Bring back consumer choice and the price mechanism back to healthcare and education and you will see it blossom.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 18h
Yes on all accounts.
My grandfather was born in a house where the doctor came to his house to deliver him. That type of healthcare used to be routine, then gov mandated insurance brought in "medical warehouses" (ie. hospitals) as desperate attempt to control price increases. That worked for awhile but stopped working about 20 years ago....and now if you go to a hospital for something routine the price starts at $15-20k and goes up to bankruptcy.
reply
All of this is due to centralization of medical school accreditation and the exclusion of everything but allopathic medicine. There used to be a lot of different kinds of medical schools until the Rockefellers put Flexner up to making his report to centralize everything. Until then, doctors were like every other worker with their own business. They also lived and died by their reputation, which you cannot find on doctors, now. Back then, I guess everybody in town knew who the good doctors were and who the doctors to avoid were. In small towns, you can still find some of that information by word of mouth.
reply
Very good comment.. 👌 Thanks for sharing
reply
Those are some of the reforms necessary, but do you really thing the state will let education and medicine devolve back to the locals or the people themselves by going free-market? Education is the way you capture the population for your purposes, a la the Rockefellers or medicine, again, thanks to the Rockefellers and the communists. They are forms of control for the ELites over the plebes.
reply