This opens a huge can of worms morally. I think I'm fine with it though.
pull down to refresh
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Feb
Yep
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @stack_harder 20 Feb
one way of keeping the pension ponzi going!
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @nerd2ninja 20 Feb
Well traditional cloning is actually just making an identical twin. So if you want a much younger baby brother who's also an identical twin, cloning is all for you.
The other parts people might think of with cloning, rapid aging (adult clones), memory importing that sort of stuff which as far as I know right now is science fiction, maybe we shouldn't do that. However, given a few changed details like if you're using both brains from formation to maturity simultaneously as one brain system, then maybe that's actually fine. Its all very messy, but that's my opinion on the matter.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 20 Feb
Again using the term "legal"... ok let me explain it again to you like I did to my daughter
So please rephrase the question.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatbad 20 Feb
Wow, that's your daughter?! You're braver than I thought!
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Aardvark OP 20 Feb
Let's talk in terms of natural law then. What is a human? Does a clone have rights? Is it moral to make a clone? Is there aggression against someone by replicating humans?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin 20 Feb
this is totally something else, see that you can do it?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark OP 20 Feb
I'd still like to hear your take on it.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 20 Feb
Yes, why not?
Depends in which situation:
- Did I make one to prolong my life in case an accident? Is OK
- Did I make many clones to fuck / do harm with other people? Is not OK.
If I consent to be cloned - Is OK
If I do not consent to be cloned, that means violation of my body - Is not OK.
reply