Well traditional cloning is actually just making an identical twin. So if you want a much younger baby brother who's also an identical twin, cloning is all for you.
The other parts people might think of with cloning, rapid aging (adult clones), memory importing that sort of stuff which as far as I know right now is science fiction, maybe we shouldn't do that. However, given a few changed details like if you're using both brains from formation to maturity simultaneously as one brain system, then maybe that's actually fine. Its all very messy, but that's my opinion on the matter.
Let's talk in terms of natural law then. What is a human? Does a clone have rights? Is it moral to make a clone? Is there aggression against someone by replicating humans?
Yep
one way of keeping the pension ponzi going!
Well traditional cloning is actually just making an identical twin. So if you want a much younger baby brother who's also an identical twin, cloning is all for you.
The other parts people might think of with cloning, rapid aging (adult clones), memory importing that sort of stuff which as far as I know right now is science fiction, maybe we shouldn't do that. However, given a few changed details like if you're using both brains from formation to maturity simultaneously as one brain system, then maybe that's actually fine. Its all very messy, but that's my opinion on the matter.
Again using the term "legal"... ok let me explain it again to you like I did to my daughter
So please rephrase the question.
Wow, that's your daughter?! You're braver than I thought!
Let's talk in terms of natural law then. What is a human? Does a clone have rights? Is it moral to make a clone? Is there aggression against someone by replicating humans?
this is totally something else, see that you can do it?
I'd still like to hear your take on it.
Yes, why not?
Depends in which situation:
If I consent to be cloned - Is OK
If I do not consent to be cloned, that means violation of my body - Is not OK.