pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @expatriotic 19 Feb \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Privacy 101: Key differences between a CoinSwap and a CoinJoin bitcoin_beginners
I'm not an chain anal company. How does ignoring your challenge mean i've somehow "lost" the argument. I'm not the government, the IRS, the chain anal company (which BTW, Wasabi worked WITH 🤮) So please stop mentioning that "challenge". I've not even read it, nor do I care. It's a fallacy to issue a challenge and then claim victory over everyone just by virtue of them not responding or caring. Me ignoring you != you winning
write
preview
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @kruw 19 Feb
I've not even read it, nor do I care.
Maybe you should read and care about Bitcoin privacy so you stop losing so much money on Monero.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @rafael_xmr 19 Feb
Monero has been outperforming Bitcoin for the past months, this argument didn't age well
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @expatriotic 19 Feb
https://www.nobsbitcoin.com/wabisabi-vulnerability-allows-malicious-coordinators-to-deanonymize-coinjoin-users/
Only people shilling Wasabi are people getting paid. @kruw can't deny it without lying
reply
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @rafael_xmr 19 Feb
run the biggest coordinator become a central point of failure become a deanonymization vector take zero fees gets paid somehow (still didn't answer) tells everyone to use HIS coinjoin and goes away when someone says the word "joinmarket" or "p2p"
All the kruw red flags
reply