One of my favorite things about Bob is that rarely if ever uses straw men but rather will steel man most things he is disagreeing with. I learned that I've had some flaws in my thinking about tariffs. It's easy to get high fives while dunking on Trump but that economist isn't a dummy. Assuming your opponents are dumb is easy these days but it's also lazy and in the long-term a mistake.
I think Bob did a show with Roger Ver and Bob seemed convinced by some of the arguments for BCH. But to be fair he had Stephan Livera come on after and offer the rebuttal case for Bitcoin and to me, seemed like he understood those points as well....
He gets bitcoin. He also sees utility in the application of blockchain and I have tried to get what he says but it doesn't make sense to me as a dev and bitcoiner.
I don't know enough to know why bitcoiners don't see any utility in that. Although, the few times when I have tried to understand other blockchain applications they ultimately didn't seem very compelling.
Interesting... I wasn't at all familiar with this theory. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
Also, yes, the Reason-type, beltway economist "uh, idiot, don't you know consumer s pay the tariff??" Is so unbelievably tiresome.
Heard of tax incidence, you twat??
Been going down the rabbit hole of different Christian faith traditions and its wild how many strawmen exist and that I had bought. Best to ask or seek out the position of the people you disagree with instead of their opposition. Strawmanning is just too easy. People take what one person says as the position and often that opinion is not the orthodox position of the group as a whole.