pull down to refresh

From here
I cannot emphasize the difference between bitcoin and crypto enough. Bitcoin is rooted in the real world via mining, node operators, and other infasctructure.
Bitcoin has no single point of failure or key person or institution. No matter how influential you think Michael Saylor or BlackRock are, they can disappear tomorrow and the bitcoin network will continue on, likely with higher bitcoin prices over time due to the concept of supply and demand if any bitcoin is lost in their disappearances. The same cannot be said about any other cryptocurrency.
Key people, organizations, and government regulations all play an outsized role in the success of the vast majority of all other cryptocurrencies.
While the writer was on the point until the last few words. At least this is what most of the so-called "real Bitcoiners" will complain. I see a lot of comments everywhere insisting "Bitcoin not crypto". But from my learning I know Bitcoin also uses cryptography and it's a digital currency. Thus the word "Cryptocurrency" is applied to all coins because all of them use cryptography.
I'm aware that others are fake digital currencies (shitcoins) and Bitcoin is only real but objections to call it a Cryptocurrency, why?
If Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency or not, It's the best and real there. So, I suggest you avoid thinking too much and keep Stacking.
reply
Simply because of the one shot principle.
"Absolute mathematical scarcity achieved by consensus in a sufficiently decentralized distributed network was a discovery rather than an invention. IT CANNOT BE ACHEIVED AGAIN since the very thing discovered was resistance to replicability itself."
-Knut Svanholm
Often imitated, never replicated. There is no second best. etc. etc.
reply
Thanks. This is a great point. If something is unique, we shouldn't associate it with a group. Does listening "Bitcoin is a Cryptocurrency" irritates you?
reply
Does listening "Bitcoin is a Cryptocurrency" irritates you?
Colloquially, it is.
But I agree with @justin_shocknet that it understates what Bitcoin is and reinforces affinity scams.
I only make the distinction clear to friends and family. It's not a crusade of mine.
reply
the very thing discovered was resistance to replicability itself.
Very good thought
reply
Maybe if I do enough goodthink, @k00b will unmute me.
reply
It's probably a good point to never refer to Bitcoin as a Cryptocurrency, because that understates what it is and signals affinity with shitcoins that have co-opted that nomenclature.
What it is, and what nothing else has the ability to call itself, is numéraire.
When you tell people its numéraire, very few will ever have heard that term. If they have any curiosity at all (are thinkers) you'll have exposed them to a great unlock in understanding from which they'll never regress.
reply
because that understates
Thanks, this makes sense to me. Also a very good example.
reply
For Satoshi it was
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 15 Feb
This is in your link:
The same cannot be said about any other cryptocurrency.
So your link is not objecting to calling bitcoin a cryptocurrency, because it literally calls bitcoin a cryptocurrency.
I see a lot of comments everywhere insisting "Bitcoin not crypto"
Didn't your link already explain why and what is meant with that phrase? It doesn't mean that bitcoin doesn't use cryptography, it means it's not like any other cryptocurrency.
reply
My link isn't objecting but there are many who do. TBH, most of the articles where I see the word 'cryptocurrency', I too don't like them but this is just a generalised term.
Most of the stackers would not like 'cryptocurrency' as word.
reply
So, my question is not on the distinction but it's about the association of "Cryptocurrency as word" with Bitcoin.
reply
Please be patient and watch this presentation. I hope it will become clear why Bitcoin is money while other "cryptos" are scams.
reply
I already know they are scams. I'm just asking why can't we use the word "Cryptocurrency for Bitcoin".
reply
Bitcoin was the first cryptocurrency, this is a fact. What Bitcoin maxis argue about is "Bitcoin vs crypto". Because too many influencers shill crypto scams as something on par with Bitcoin.
reply
I'm just asking why can't we use the word "Cryptocurrency for Bitcoin".
Maybe it's the word 'currency'; it means it's issued or backed by someone or something? Bitcoin is very different from these cryptocurrencies. You can call it CryptoMoney if you want to 🤣
reply
Then, they are wrong (or narrow thinking), currency is something that can be used as MoE.
reply
How would you orange pill a nocoiner if you told them, 'Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency'? If they do their own research, they might end up looking into other alternative coins, thinking they are the same as Bitcoin. Don't they? That's why we need to distinguish Bitcoin from cryptocurrencies, which function more like corporations and are not truly decentralized or can even be hybrid types. Bitcoin is just the opposite of that, so you definitely need to clear things out.
reply
So, we can say Bitcoin is money. But again they might end up comparing it with a lot of fuss. I'm not sure if you only tell someone "Bitcoin" and he doesn't come across the word "Cryptocurrency".
We can/should rather say "Bitcoin is the one and only Cryptocurrency." Can we?
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 15 Feb
Did you read this?
I'm aware that others are fake digital currencies (shitcoins) and Bitcoin is only real but objections to call it a Cryptocurrency, why?
reply