pull down to refresh

I've arrived at a valuation of roughly a million dollars per bitcoin, with a couple of different approaches. That's also what Fidelity landed on with one of their analyses.
The issue is probably that the growth path is so uncertain that only very long term capital can act accordingly.
22 sats \ 7 replies \ @Aardvark 13h
How did you come up with that?
reply
It's basically a combination of ultimate price and how long full adoption takes.
My first estimate for final valuation was just taking the global money supply and dividing by 21M. That got me something like $10M btc. If that's still several decades out, you get a present discounted value of $1M.
My second estimate is discussed in this post: #474759. Assuming bitcoin absorbs the monetary premia of other assets, again over the next several decades, it would have a discounted present value of about $1M.
That's also the point of sat-cent parity, which isn't really important, but is neat. That's why I basically treat sats as though their worth one cent.
reply
I’ve already seen estimates of $10 trillion, considering the total amount of assets in circulation worldwide. It’s good to see that more people have done this calculation. I don’t feel as bad for thinking it’s undervalued. I’ll read your article.
reply
38 sats \ 4 replies \ @Aardvark 13h
Makes buying it at 100k feel pretty discounted in that case.
reply
It is steeply discounted. Think how few wealthy people have converted significant shares of their portfolios into Bitcoin. At some point, that capital will come rushing in, because btc is a better store of value than real estate, gold, bonds, stocks, etc.
reply
37 sats \ 2 replies \ @Aardvark 13h
My wifes job is laying people off, I'm just hoping she gets a new job before she gets cut. I'd love to keep stacking at my current pace for as long as possible.
reply
Real world constraints are a pain in the ass.
I hope everything works out well for her.