Lots of great "why coinjoin" and "why privacy" thought threads in here.
pull down to refresh
50 sats \ 3 replies \ @endothermicdev 13 Feb
Part of this is to actively obscure particular transactions. But it would also be nice to have average transactions stand out less by breaking the common input ownership heuristic with payjoins. If chain analysis can no longer tell who is the receiver and who's sending, it passively benefits the privacy of everyone - saves on utxos consolidations too.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @OT 13 Feb
I think payjoin only works along with coinjoins
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 13 Feb
If you mean you can’t payjoin without doing a coinjoin, that’s not true. Payjoin is just the sender interacting with the receiver to create a tx that pays the receiver, allowing the receiver to add additional inputs of their own (if I’m not mistaken).
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 13 Feb
No, I mean if you only use payjoin it's still pretty easy to track. If payjoin were in every wallet that would be different.
reply
11 sats \ 1 reply \ @expatriotic 19 Feb
Thanks for sharing this
Just saw this
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @expatriotic 19 Feb
Bingo
reply
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @expatriotic 19 Feb
Imagine if Bitcoin core devs had implemented more privacy on the base layer in the early years instead of punting... We wouldn't need the Free Samourai hashtag (just passed 300 days BTW) because paid coinjoin implementations for the base layer wouldn't have needed to exist.
But we've already seen that when you offer true privacy, like the devs of Monero did, they get delisted from exchanges. And people prefer NGU more than privacy IMO... So that was a non-starter.
So now privacy is being pushed to second and third layers (LN, Liquid, e-cash etc.) with devs of coinjoins being targeting for helping to pass data packets between UTXO holders...
Fucked up world... I hope the DoJ gets their shit together under Trump and stops persecuting the Samourai Wallet developers
reply