pull down to refresh

A very entertaining critique of anarchism. But not all bitcoiners are anarchists, and even if you're correct (Which you are), that doesn't mean that it wouldn't be optimal to cut the government at the margins
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 4h
the problem with OP's thesis is he doesn't understand the check on executive power is the legislative and judicial branches
Unelected federal bureaucrats and agencies are not supposed to check executive branch!
reply
I would like to see way more guidance and debate from congress.
reply
Matthew Kratter is a huge Bitcoiner on Youtube and, in my humble opinion, has gone full red-pill pro-twitter pro-trump burn down the government-anarchy.
The government needs reform, no-one disagrees with that. But twitter is a for-profit company and they own (like all social media) all the content on their site and is 100% for-profit.
Furthermore, the billionaires behind Mr Trump that day constitute the Big-Tech Monopolies which is not what Bitcoin stands for. How Bitcoiners just hand-wave this away while supporting the concentration of information... is not healthy.
reply
Never heard of him. Sounds like just the same old clickbait recipe of "guessing what people wanna hear". Just don't watch the vid - encourages one more soul to simply work for their moneys (and maybe shed some costs like the lambo.)
reply
Matthew Kratter has a good channel on YouTube. It's great for beginners or anyone seeking a layperson's explanation of technical details
reply
I agree. It's the recent twitter-fi-cation that concerns me.
reply