pull down to refresh

If you think about it, you can sum the sats on posts and add the post cost for each: you'd get ~6309 sats
I wonder how the downzaps are counted in that total
reply
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @sox 7 Feb
I wonder how the downzaps are counted in that total
Edit: It will increase the 'spent' value
reply
goood is even more confusing hahahahaha
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @sox 7 Feb
Weeeeeeell I caused the confusion here because I had a brainfart, edited the post accordingly
reply
LOL now is even more confusing. I like this.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @sox 7 Feb
lol zapping someone increases both the stacked and spent values; downzapping, instead, keeps the stacked value the same but increases the spent value (a user is still spending in the territory)
A downzap is not a way of contributing to the 'stack'! Quite the opposite xd
example:
But there are only two posts in the territory. 420 sats each.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @sox 7 Feb
people spent sats on zaps though, even in comments
reply
huh... okay, guess that's it, the total zaps plus cost to post
reply