pull down to refresh

If you think about it, you can sum the sats on posts and add the post cost for each: you'd get ~6309 sats

I wonder how the downzaps are counted in that total

reply
I wonder how the downzaps are counted in that total

Edit: It will increase the 'spent' value

reply

goood is even more confusing hahahahaha

reply

Weeeeeeell I caused the confusion here because I had a brainfart, edited the post accordingly

reply

LOL now is even more confusing. I like this.

reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @sox 7 Feb 2025

lol zapping someone increases both the stacked and spent values; downzapping, instead, keeps the stacked value the same but increases the spent value (a user is still spending in the territory)

A downzap is not a way of contributing to the 'stack'! Quite the opposite xd

example:

reply

That's why I always proposed to separate up/downvotes (CCs) from zaps (sats) #722919 so users will make a clear distinction of each action.

reply

But there are only two posts in the territory. 420 sats each.

reply

people spent sats on zaps though, even in comments

reply

huh... okay, guess that's it, the total zaps plus cost to post

reply