A Practical Guide for Lightning Network Optimization with Octahedron-Based Channel Structure
pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @nikotsla 7 Feb
I think the size and fees need to be "static" in order to represent the "lines" of the structure in some way. If one node rise the fees a lot, maybe the structure is not valid anymore because one vertex disappear.
It's an interesting idea.
reply
21 sats \ 3 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 7 Feb
Would automating this method mean creating channels with people you don't know?
reply
47 sats \ 2 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Feb
I would prefer a manual connection. I do not like automated opening channels.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 7 Feb
That's what I thought. But for that you have to be co-ordinated with 5 other nodes and all agree to open 2out+2in channels between them. I don't see this getting traction! But it's an interesting idea.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Feb
Yes, this is not an usual way to open channels but is possible to coordinate with other peers.
On https://lightningnetwork.plus/ you can do such coordination. And Rings Of Fire also organize these kind of coordinated batch opening channels.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SwapMarket 7 Feb
Why not start with tetrahedrons? They are simpler and more symmetrical.
reply
0 sats \ 13 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 7 Feb
It would be interesting if you left a comment on his blog linking to the SN share!
reply
0 sats \ 12 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Feb
I fw the sats to his SN account. He will notice.
reply
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 7 Feb
Do you mean CCs? Aahah. He probably doesn't get notifications. forwarded zaps are converted into CCs!
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Feb
NOTHING WRONG WITH CCs
reply
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 7 Feb
right! You should've written ...
I fw the CCs to his SN account. He will notice.
instead of ...
ðŸ¤
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Feb
it says sats... I do not make the SN rules
view all 8 replies