pull down to refresh

In everything that I do, from driving my car, to browsing the internet, the phone I use, the websites I browse, the details of how a program gets installed, what information I upload to any given service, and whether I should comply with the law about giving them correct information or not, here's a detailed write-up on why I'm paranoid and why you should be too. The article may also serve as a bit of a manifesto of sorts because I'm feeling spicy right now. So buckle up.

Why Fear Everyday Life?

In an article written by cleveland.com, a news website Women have an ever-present fear of being attacked where they write that despite the statistics which show that violent crime victims are more often men than women (a statistic they quote from https://nij.ojp.gov/, but don't directly link), they quote Jodi Lane, a University of Florida sociology professor as saying, "[Society] puts the burden on women to be really afraid.” Nonetheless perception is lived reality and so we get the "Man vs Bear" debate.1

Being Attacked Everyday

When it comes to digital life, every person is under constant threat everyday. What's worse is the learned helplessness around it. First let me describe the attacks

What's Real?

You may be an active thinker who wouldn't believe just anything you found on the internet without much thought though you probably aren't and can worn down even if you do, but lets be honest, in a world where people take what a generative text model (ChatGPT) outputs as though it were factual evidence from a search engine, as gospel, your fellow human is not fact checking all of that. Yes, this is a call out. People over at Harvard complain that social media algorithms determine what people even think about in the first place rather than information delivered by news organizations. Your social media algorithm isn't driven with your best interest in mind. Those psychological experiments conducted by facebook weren't just a one off. The lessons learned from it are applied to modern marketing practices and every social media website with an algorithm created by a company big enough to know what they're doing. This is a psychological attack on what information you're even shown in the first place. What's worse is memory implantation. So long as you aren't paying too much attention, you might be convinced to conveniently misremember events especially during elections.
All of this is driven by data analytics of course, but using an x.com .onion native website over the tor browser is not enough to address these concerns. So I don't have an x account (nor do I respect it enough to give a damn that people want to keep calling it twitter) because I'm way too paranoid for it. I'm too paranoid for it, because its a website that attacks its users with every minute of use.

Through Threat of Violence, Promise of Monetary Reward, or Social Exile, I Say "NO"

There are many reasons people choose to accept and comply with these attacks rather than defend themselves against them. That state wants to know every cent not only of your income, but your outcome. The outcome they achieve by getting other people's incomes and in the case of Bitcoin require you to report it. FinCen rules are the panopticon. They don't need to go any further with cameras on every street corner, and yet they do still go further.
The state is creepy as hell. The FBI for example publicly makes known that rather than obtaining a warrant, the bureau purchased sensitive data Worried about government mass surveillance? Don't have a cell phone. You and I are under attack every moment of our lives.
The government the potential for the abuse of mass surveillance systems aside for a moment (as huge as that it to move to the side), there are also financial reasons for privacy. Your 'Connected' Car May Be Transmitting Your Driving Data to Insurance Companies. This data could be used to lower your insurance rate or raise your insurance rate. I believe people that they have no data on will have to pay a premium to people who they do have driving data on. What's worse is that in the US car insurance is mandatory in most states and driving is not optional due to how our infrastructure is built.
Your debit/credit card company is selling your purchase data to companies wouldn't a health insurance company love to know everything you've eaten so they can charge you more for health insurance (or charge you less). Once again I believe that people they have no data on will have to pay a premium to people they have data on.

Solutions and GPLv3 Software

So the way to address some of these concerns is to spoof the data collected in a way that's beneficial to you. In order to do all of that, we need to write software for it. We want to make it such that you don't have to actually use a social media platform to have a public presence your employer can use to judge you on (oh yeah that's a thing too. I hear its suspicious to employers if you don't have social media). because if you're using it you can be manipulated by it. We also want to write software that is self hosted such that all real data (health tracking and GPS come to mind) stays private. So if you want to help fight off the attacks against humankind, help by writing GPLv3 licensed software. MIT licensed software is not helpful because companies can take it, make it addictive, and attack humanity with your code.
Out of the night that covers me, Black as the pit from pole to pole, I thank whatever gods may be For my unconquerable soul.
In the fell clutch of circumstance I have not winced nor cried aloud. Under the bludgeonings of chance My head is bloody, but unbowed.
Beyond this place of wrath and tears Looms but the Horror of the shade, And yet the menace of the years Finds and shall find me unafraid.
It matters not how strait the gate, How charged with punishments the scroll, I am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul.
--William Ernest Henley, "Invictus"

Footnotes

  1. This section was originally going to simply be a set up for a comparison about how people who are always being attacked have to always worry and be paranoid, but wanting to get my facts straight I had to quote the sources and the sources say that in reality the idea that women are attacked more than men is just perception.
Love life as a human. Exercise and get sunlight everyday and try to help someone with something!
reply
where people take what a generative text model (ChatGPT) outputs as though it were factual evidence from a search engine
"factual evidence from a search engine"
reply
Okay "from a search engine" wasn't quite the right way to put that, more factual evidence from a reputable source from one of the search engine's results, but you get the idea. Yeah yeah its worse. Its always worse lol.
reply
Yeah I was laughing too hard from that same line to reply.
reply
Outrage Fatigue is real. In this world full of information (misinformation), it's really difficult to avoid. There's really not one way to setup and avoid it, you need to be keep omitting it out of your life.
reply
300 sats \ 1 reply \ @Msd0457890 21h
I understand you perfectly, my friend. I have been through this many times, but being aware that the system only seeks to control me, to see what I do and what I don't, we should all take measures and disassociate ourselves from the financial system and from it in general every day. This is the first time I read this about LGPLv3, how does it work? or how can I use it?
reply
Just when you write software and publish it, you license it with GPLv3. If you use Github it will actually be one of the options to select a license for your code. As a user, source code is source code.
Personally, when searching for software, you can use its FOSS or F-droid for initial discovery, then search the name of the program in a search engine using the following syntax:
site:github.com obtainium
as an example this will tell the search engine you want results from github.com for the program called obtainium
OR
site:gitlab.com program_name
Again as a user, source code is source code, but if you want to prefer GPLv3 software (more popular software does tend to get more developers working on it afterall) you can then look at what license the program uses.
reply
309 sats \ 0 replies \ @1GLENCoop 22h
reply
500 sats \ 1 reply \ @nullama 17h
So if you want to help fight off the attacks against humankind, help by writing GPLv3 licensed software. MIT licensed software is not helpful because companies can take it, make it addictive, and attack humanity with your code.
If you look at the real world history, you will see that many companies don't really care about the license. That's partly what motivated this project to exist: https://gpl-violations.org
Be more like Satoshi, and release your code with as few constraints as possible, i.e. MIT:
If the only library is closed source, then there's a project to make an open source one.
If the only library is GPL, then there's a project to make a non-GPL one.
If the best library is MIT, Boost, new-BSD or public domain, then we can stop re-writing it.
I don't question that GPL is a good license for operating systems, especially since non-GPL code is allowed to interface with the OS. For smaller projects, I think the fear of a closed-source takeover is overdone.
reply
If the only library is GPL, then there's a project to make a non-GPL one.
GOOD. Make them spend the man hours. The MIT license is a weak license that doesn't know how to say NO.
But that's enough sats wasted on software license flame wars. If you really want to keep this up, ping me on nostr or something lol.
reply
what is GPLv3 Software ?
reply
GPLv3 is the based software license that stands apart from Open Source and goes a step further. Sometimes referred to as Libre source. It specifically prohibits that the software be used in a proprietary program. Companies have to either license their code as GPLv3 (and provide the source code) of the program they've written, or in some cases where the code bases are separated in just a certain way, they can provide the source code to the GPLv3 licensed code (which they are only required to provide to people they've sold the software to which with freeware or not cost software would be everyone) while still keeping the proprietary part proprietary. The code base has to be set up a certain way to make that work though.
Watch a few Richard Stallman videos and you'll probably understand why people use it.
reply
The dual license edge case not an intended part of the GPLv3 license, its just because of the way the law works, the license can't prevent that edge case.
reply
GPLv3 is one of many software licenses for open source. More precisely, GPLv3 is associated with the concept of copyleft
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @LowK3y19 17h
My boy swears that feds always be following him
reply
I swear that my devices and online activity is 100% caught up with the rest of the mass surveillance drag net. I don't care about targeted surveillance, that's just an investigation which gets initiated when you're suspected of something. What I care about, is surveillance of people who are not suspected of anything, for 2 reasons.
  1. An unenforceable law is no law at all. Most of the really shitty laws that no one liked had an enforcement problem because they simply couldn't surveil everyone all at once.
  2. Because getting fines for accidentally coloring outside the lines a little bit is 100% a way a government will try to raise money at some point (speeding tickets are already a huge income generator)
Now the problem is, when we already have mass surveillance, anyone who doesn't get caught in the drag net then gets targeted by default. So now all of a sudden I DO have to care about targeted surveillance.
reply